Oasys Design Systems Enhances Chip Synthesis with Power Capabilities

New Power Synthesis Feature Re-Synthesizes from RTL with Power Constraints, Supports CPF, UPF Support to Come

SANTA CLARA, CALIF. –– February 24, 2011 Oasys Design Systems today unveiled the latest version of its revolutionary Chip Synthesis™ platform with enhanced capabilities that include chip-level power analysis and the ability to re-synthesize a design from the register transfer level (RTL) with new power constraints.

“Power is now the toughest design constraint,” asserts Paul van Besouw, Oasys’ president and chief executive officer (CEO).  “Traditional synthesis tools can’t handle power in ways that are effective for project teams because power is a chip-level problem not a block-level problem.”

RealTime Designer™ allows power to be managed at the chip level and gives project teams a way to re-synthesize an existing RTL design to take into account a new power architecture.  It can read input files from the Common Power Format (CPF) from Si2, the way low-power policies are described, and will soon support IEEE Standard 1801-2009, based on Accellera’s Unified Power Format (UPF).  It also supports multiple voltage threshold optimization and clock gating.

“CPF has enjoyed widespread industry adoption, with strong support from industry leaders and emerging companies such as Oasys Design Systems,” says Steve Schulz, president and CEO of Si2.  “I am confident their investment in CPF will continue to reap increasing dividends as the Low-Power Coalition advances CPF, for example the numerous powerful capabilities just released in CPF 2.0.”

The tool offers a way for designers to experiment with voltage levels and power tradeoffs at the architectural level for maximum impact, while taking all power measurements from a fully placed netlist.  During synthesis, RealTime Designer inserts all the appropriate level shifters, isolation cells and retention registers, as specified in the power policy.

It is not necessary to have a complete CPF or UPF file before using RealTime Designer.  Instead, the power policy can be explored for various scenarios and RealTime Designer can be used interactively to consider alternative power policies without needing them to be fully specified in an external file.  When this “what-if” analysis is complete and the final policy has been selected, RealTime Designer will write out the CPF or UPF file to be used by other tools, such as analysis and verification, and traditional place and route tools.

Chip Synthesis is a fundamental shift in how synthesis is applied to the design and implementation of integrated circuits (ICs).  Traditional synthesis, with its limited capacity, forces power to be considered at the level of each individual block, and some master plan to be created to allocate the power budget among those blocks without really having any good information as guidance.

Block level tools do a poor job of handling chip-level issues.  RealTime Designer is the first design tool for physical register transfer level (RTL) synthesis of 100-million gate designs.  It features a unique RTL placement approach that eliminates unending design closure iterations between synthesis and layout.

RealTime Designer follows a “Place First” methodology that takes RTL, partitions it into blocks, places the RTL in the context of a floorplan and implements each block all the way to placement.  Chip-level constraints are automatically propagated across the blocks and the design is optimized for the best possible quality of results.  During the optimization phase, RealTime Designer will repartition the design at the RTL and re-implement it until chip-level constraints are met.

Gary Meyers on Synplicity ASIC vs Oasys

Gary, Synplicity entered and then left the ASIC synthesis market. What is the story there? And why do you think Oasys will do well?

Yes, Synplicity did enter the ASIC synthesis market and we actually performed very well – amassing close to 100 cell-based ASIC synthesis customers.  When the Structured ASIC opportunity emerged, we thought it would be a way to differentiate ourselves and we were fortunate enough to execute what were effectively exclusive arrangements with the leaders in the market.  I recall the time when LSI Logic, after bringing on their new CEO, opted to exit their RapidChip Structured ASIC business.  I had just arrived in Munich for the DATE European EDA tradeshow that year, and had to turn around and get right back on the plane.  I didn’t even have a chance to walk the tradeshow floor or meet a single customer.  Ultimately, as in any business, companies need to be nimble and adapt to market dynamics – and when the Structured ASIC business fell out of favor, we needed to act quickly.  It could have gone the other way, too.  In the end I learned that while incumbency confers huge advantage, semiconductor customers are faced with enormous challenges and are always interested in more productive tools that offer better results.  And there are always niches and subsegments that nimble players can get in and win.

I think Oasys is the next rising star in synthesis and I only hope my experience can help them get to that level of success a bit sooner.

Gary Meyers on joining the Oasys board

What attracted you to Oasys?

There is a lot to like about Oasys.  First, I am always interested in talented teams trying to solve very hard problems.  Paul and his leadership team have been there before – successfully – with Ambit Design Systems, and they have developed a radical new solution to an existing problem, not just an incremental improvement over current methods.  Second, I like the focus of the company being implementation.  It’s an area I know well, it’s a very large segment of the tools market, and the problem is constantly evolving.  I also appreciate that the team has put some of its focus on the FPGA market – an area I have experience in and in which I hope to contribute.  Third, it was attractive to work with Joe Costello who is also on the board.  I’ve had the privelege to work with and learn from some of the industry’s great leaders – Aart DeGeus, Chi-Foon Chan, Bernie Aronson, Ken McElvain, Prabu Goel, and so on.  Working with Joe has started off on a great note and I know will prove to be a terrific experience.  Overall, I thought this would be fun.

What makes Oasys different?

With its “place-first” methodology, Oasys has successfully cracked the code of using physical information early in the synthesis process.  They’ve also developed an incredibly efficient way of managing data – enabling much larger blocks of code to be synthesized in a fraction of the time of other tools.  This advantage will be increasingly important given escalating design sizes and continued deep submicron scaling.

How involved will you be?

Like any other board commitment, I plan to be involved as much as Paul (Oasys’ CEO) needs.  I’ll focus my time where I can contribute the most.  My C++ is rusty (actually, non-existent), but I can help in the sales and marketing area, in funding efforts, and perhaps in some of the strategic thinking as the company grows.

What’s your first order of business as a member of the board?

I expect to jump in on the sales side as I believe the relationships I’ve developed with customers can be an asset to Paul.  Of course, I’m prepared to support Paul wherever I can.

How do you think 2011 looks for EDA in general?

I think 2011 will be a good and an interesting year for EDA.  Stock prices are rising with companies recovering from the recession.  Stronger balance sheets and increasing equity values among the key players should enable continued consolidation – perhaps on a bigger scale than we’ve seen recently – which will improve the business model and provide a stronger foundation for investing in the demands of deep submicron semiconductor technology.  The technical challenges remain exciting, immense, and growing, and innovative companies like Oasys have a good chance at being in the core of the next generation design flow.

Gary Meyers Named to Oasys Design Systems’ Board of Directors

Experienced Chief Executive to Provide Invaluable Insight as Oasys Moves into Next Business Phase

SANTA CLARA, CALIF. –– February 11, 2011 — Gary Meyers, an experienced electronic design automation (EDA) and semiconductor executive, has been named to the Board of Directors of Oasys Design Systems, provider of Chip Synthesis™, a fundamental shift in how synthesis is applied to integrated circuit (IC) design and implementation.

“We’re delighted to welcome Gary Meyers to our board,” says Paul van Besouw, Oasys’ president and chief executive officer (CEO).  “His experience, skill set and understanding of the synthesis market are unparalleled.  Gary’s input will be invaluable as we move into the next phase of our business.”

Mr. Meyers joins the board composed of Joe Costello, chairman and CEO of Orb Networks and former CEO of Cadence Design Systems, Larry Yoshida, Premier Technologies chairman and CEO, and Oasys co-founders Paul van Besouw and Johnson Limqueco, vice president of R&D.  He also is a member of the board of directors of Exar Corporation, a semiconductor firm serving the datacom, storage, consumer and industrial markets, and served on the board of SpiraTech, Ltd, prior to its acquisition by Mentor Graphics.

Formerly president and CEO of Synplicity, the leading supplier of FPGA synthesis software and ASIC prototyping systems acquired by Synopsys Inc. in 2008, Mr. Meyers mostly recently served as a Synopsys vice president and general manager.  Previously, he was vice president of worldwide sales at Synplicity from 1998-2004, and held senior sales and marketing director roles at LSI Corporation.

Mr. Meyers holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Maryland in College Park, Md., and an MBA from the University of California at Los Angeles.

“Oasys Design Systems is the most exciting synthesis entrant in years and is shaking up the field in a way we haven’t seen since logic synthesis in the late 1980s,” notes Meyers.  “Its RealTime Designer is giving early adopters an unmistakable competitive advantage.  I’m very excited to join this innovative team.”

RealTime Designer™ is the first design tool for physical register transfer level (RTL) synthesis of 100-million gate designs.  It features a unique RTL placement approach that eliminates unending design closure iterations between synthesis and layout.

About Oasys Design Systems

Oasys Design Systems is a privately funded electronic design automation (EDA) software supplier with a revolutionary new platform called Chip Synthesis™, a fundamental shift in how synthesis is used to design and implement ICs larger than 20-million gates.  It has attracted the support of legendary EDA leaders and its RealTime Designer™ is in use at leading-edge semiconductor and systems companies worldwide.  Follow Oasys on Twitter at: www.twitter.com/OasysDS.  Corporate Headquarters is located at 3250 Olcott Street, Suite 120, Santa Clara, Calif.  95054. Telephone:  (408) 855-8531.  Facsimile:  (408) 855- 8537.  Email:  info@oasys-ds.com.  For more information, visit:  www.oasys-ds.com.

New Web Site

Well, you’ve made it here so you must have noticed that Oasys has a new website. The old website was just too difficult to maintain when anything more than adding a blog entry or editing a page was required. If you are interested, the new site is built on top of WordPress hosted on a Linux server at web.com. When I switched edagraffiti away from the EDN website I went with WordPress and, after an unwanted experiment to discover that WordPress really doesn’t work properly on a shared Windows host, got it up on Linux. This time it was painless and from calling web.com to set up the host to having most of the site up and running took only a couple of hours.

But wait, there’s more. Look at the top of the page. Oasys has a new logo too. Oasys is making waves and now its logo reflects that.

RealTime Designer vs DC-topo/DC-graphical

John Cooley has an (anonymous) benchmark of Oasys versus Synopsys, specifically pitting RealTime Designer against DC-topo and DC-graphical. It’s quite a long post so go over there to read it.

Here are some of the conclusions:

RTD’s Strengths:

- Capacity and runtime. In an age of data explosion and design
explosion, for design optimization, if we can get rapid feedback on
designs with same or better QOR than DC, we can effectively eliminate
a significant bottleneck. Then we can focus on the other bottlenecks
and tackle more challenging and larger designs.
- The AE support for the tool has been pretty outstanding.

RTD’s Weaknesses:

- Needs more API hooks into the database.
- UI could be a bit more clean.
- Scan/Test features for DFT need to be fully implemented.
- Having quicker fixes for QoR bugs and feature enhancements, i.e. fully
buffered and physically sized netlist output, effort settings on
optimization, etc. The tool is still new, and we’ve been fortunate to
have pretty responsive fixes to most issues we’ve seen.
- Oasys TcL isn’t 100% compatible with DC Tcl.

It is hard to really gauge the ripple effect of rapid physical synthesis
with strong correlation to backend timing tools, but I believe it represents
a fundamental paradigm shift in the way design is done.

EVE kinda endorses Oasys

Over at EDAcafe.com there is a guest blog post from Lauro Rizzatti, the General Manager of EVE-USA who make emulators. He says:

“Entrepreneurial Rajeev Madhavan concluded in the late 1990s that synthesis needed to be linked with physical design.  He and his innovative team at Magma introduced the first physical synthesis and rocked the industry.  And, with Madhavan still at the helm, Magma is still innovating today.  Now, Oasys Design Systems‚ team introduced a new synthesis methodology known as Chip Synthesis, enabling designers to synthesize full chips and not just blocks.  That technology, too, is rocking the industry.”

Now those of us who were at Ambit might argue that PKS was actually the first physical synthesis tool, Magma was really doing synthesis as part of place and route. Still, that’s nitpicking. If Oasys ends up being as successful as Magma at rocking the industry I don’t think anyone here will complain!